1 |
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote: |
4 |
> >> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: |
5 |
> >>> On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote: |
6 |
> >>>> Hi, |
7 |
> >>>> |
8 |
> >>>> I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImage |
9 |
> >>>> has moved from arch/i386/boot/bzImage to arch/x86/boot/bzImage. When |
10 |
> >>>> did this happen? Is x86 the same as i386? |
11 |
> >>> |
12 |
> >>> yes. They merged the '386' and the amd64/x86_64 architecture into x86. |
13 |
> >>> |
14 |
> >>> And it happend a couple of kernel versions ago. |
15 |
> >> |
16 |
> >> OK. At least I ain't going crazy. Whew, that was close. |
17 |
> >> |
18 |
> >>>> I'm just wanting to make sure I am not going to blow up something when |
19 |
> >>>> I boot that thing. |
20 |
> >>> |
21 |
> >>> why do you care anyway? Just install debianutils and use make install. |
22 |
> >> |
23 |
> >> I like to copy mine manually. I dunno, I just do. I'm weird that way. |
24 |
> >> I also have a unique way of naming my kernels so I can keep up with |
25 |
> >> which is which. |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > well, you can always put the name in the config - and let make install do |
28 |
> > the copy. That way you get a nice vmlinuz symlink to the latest kernel |
29 |
> > and vmlinuz.old to the older one - and you never have to touch grub.conf |
30 |
> > again. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> But that would only allow you to have two kernels laying around. Right |
33 |
> now I have these: |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
no, you can have as many kernels as you want. But there is a vmlinuz symlink |
37 |
to the latest and vmlinuz.old symlink to the previous installed one. |