1 |
On Monday 13 October 2008 13:53:49 YoYo siska wrote: |
2 |
> tabletka ~ # equery hasuse xinerama | wc -l |
3 |
> 285 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> most of them are apps from kde-base/* (3.5.9), seems that it changed |
6 |
> between 3.5.9 and 3.5.10, plus iwndow managers like fluxbox, openbox... |
7 |
|
8 |
That looks better. I was convinced that most kde-3 apps had a xinerama USE |
9 |
flag, hence my 'emerge -e world' comment that Iain picked up on. |
10 |
|
11 |
I wonder why it was changed for KDE-3.5.10, it seems that Xinerama support is |
12 |
now automatically built for most of KDE-3 (deduced by examining the ebuild |
13 |
and ldd output) |
14 |
|
15 |
> > Obviously, this understanding of mine is flawed. Which bit did I get |
16 |
> > wrong? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Xinerama consists basically of two parts, the protocol to communicate the |
19 |
> position/sizes of screen between the Xserver and the applications (which |
20 |
> you usually get by enabling the xinerama use flag) and an xserver part |
21 |
> (module?) that you can use to set up the screens. What you said is |
22 |
> correct for the Xserver setup part... |
23 |
|
24 |
> You use either xinerama setup to put together completely different |
25 |
> displays (might be different cards, such as one nvidia, one ati, ...) |
26 |
> or twinview in case of a dualhead nvidia setup. But both this setups use |
27 |
> the xinerama protocol to let the apps/wm know the placement of the |
28 |
> monitors. |
29 |
|
30 |
<penny drops> |
31 |
|
32 |
OK, so there's a xinerama protocol and a xinerama lib and these are not the |
33 |
same thing |
34 |
|
35 |
</penny drops> |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |