| 1 |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:15, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> You are; but in an incredible complicated and convulted way. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> If I'm understanding you, you want: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> fstab: |
| 9 |
>> /dev/XX /mnt/p1 ... |
| 10 |
>> /dev/YY /mnt/p2 ... |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> and then |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> /usr/portage -> /mnt/p1 |
| 15 |
>> /usr/src -> /mnt/p2 |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> (or using bindmounting, whatever). |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> This makes no sense at all (at least not to me), when you can simply: |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> fstab: |
| 22 |
>> /dev/XX /usr/portage ... |
| 23 |
>> /dev/YY /usr/src ... |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> and get the same split filesystem, but without all the complication |
| 26 |
>> you are proposing. |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> Unless there is something I don't understand, in which case I'm not |
| 29 |
>> following your reasoning. |
| 30 |
>> |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> The point is: It's not just 2 (two) directories, but several of them, |
| 33 |
> and I just can't see myself creating a partition (or an LV) for each |
| 34 |
> and everyone of them. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> So, here's my thoughts: |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> There are 2 filesystems that are suitable for different purposes: |
| 39 |
> * reiserfs = for space efficiency (w/o notail option) and/or no inode# |
| 40 |
> limitation |
| 41 |
> * ext4 = for general purpose |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> The directories I'm going to split: |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> /usr/share ==> ext4 |
| 46 |
> /usr/portage ==> reiserfs |
| 47 |
> /usr/portage/packages ==> ext4 |
| 48 |
> /usr/portage/distfiles ==> ext4 |
| 49 |
> /usr/src ==> reiserfs |
| 50 |
> /var/cache/rtorrent (don't ask) ==> reiserfs |
| 51 |
> /var/spool/postfix ==> ext4 |
| 52 |
> /var/lib/postgresql ==> ext4 |
| 53 |
> |
| 54 |
> Now, I create 2 partitions: |
| 55 |
> |
| 56 |
> /dev/sdc1 (reiserfs) --> /mnt/Persistent1 |
| 57 |
> /dev/sdd1 (ext4) --> /mnt/Persistent2 |
| 58 |
> |
| 59 |
> Then I create subdirectories: |
| 60 |
> |
| 61 |
> /mnt/Persistent1/portage |
| 62 |
> /mnt/Persistent1/src |
| 63 |
> /mnt/Persistent1/rtorrent |
| 64 |
> |
| 65 |
> /mnt/Persistent2/share |
| 66 |
> /mnt/Persistent2/packages |
| 67 |
> /mnt/Persistent2/distfiles |
| 68 |
> /mnt/Persistent2/postfix |
| 69 |
> /mnt/Persistent2/postgresql |
| 70 |
> |
| 71 |
> Finally, I need to redirect the directories-I-want-to-split to the |
| 72 |
> above subdirs under /mnt/Persistent[12] |
| 73 |
> |
| 74 |
> SO. |
| 75 |
> |
| 76 |
> mount -o bind ... or ln -s ? |
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
OK, now I understand. I still think is kinda crazy, but to each its own. |
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
I would definitely use symlinks. |
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
Regards. |
| 83 |
-- |
| 84 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
| 85 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
| 86 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |
Archives