| 1 |
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:57:27PM -0400, Jack wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2020.06.19 12:10, urpion@×××.com wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 04:52:30PM +0100, Michael wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Friday, 19 June 2020 16:35:27 BST urpion@×××.com wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 09:45:59AM -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > > Jack wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > > > Not far enough back. You need to show the actual error, not |
| 8 |
> > the line |
| 9 |
> > > > > > "Error1:" which gets printed after the error. |
| 10 |
> > > > > |
| 11 |
> > > > > And depending on the number of cores/threads and other emerge |
| 12 |
> > settings, |
| 13 |
> > > > > it can be a dozen, two dozen lines or sometimes even further |
| 14 |
> > back than |
| 15 |
> > > > > that. With CPUs having a dozen or so cores/threads, it's |
| 16 |
> > amazing that |
| 17 |
> > > > > some stuff compiles at all. Prime example, recent thread about |
| 18 |
> > Pam |
| 19 |
> > > > > updates. |
| 20 |
> > > > > |
| 21 |
> > > > > OP, if needed, tar the whole error log and attach it. Just |
| 22 |
> > don't post |
| 23 |
> > > > > it elsewhere and link to it tho. After a while, it's gone or a |
| 24 |
> > person |
| 25 |
> > > > > finds the log but not this thread with the solution. |
| 26 |
> > > > > |
| 27 |
> > > > > Dale |
| 28 |
> > > > > |
| 29 |
> > > > > :-) :-) |
| 30 |
> > > > |
| 31 |
> > > > Ah ha. Yes Thank you. Sorry, I've never been good with e-mail:-P |
| 32 |
> > > |
| 33 |
> > > |
| 34 |
> > > NP, did you get an OOM error in dmesg when this happened by any |
| 35 |
> > chance? You |
| 36 |
> > > don't seem to have much RAM, you have no swap and the number of |
| 37 |
> > jobs is |
| 38 |
> > > relatively high for memory hungry compiles. |
| 39 |
> > > |
| 40 |
> > > It could be a bug, but unless a report has been filed already in |
| 41 |
> > BGO to this |
| 42 |
> > > effect, I suggest you add a swapfile, enable it, and try again with |
| 43 |
> > > MAKEOPTS="-j1" or "-j2". Please ask if you need more detail. |
| 44 |
> > |
| 45 |
> > |
| 46 |
> > I was thinking about -j1. I tried -j4. I thought I didn't need swap |
| 47 |
> > with >=4GB |
| 48 |
> > of RAM, but it makes sense. My machine kinda crawls trying to build |
| 49 |
> > that |
| 50 |
> > package. Oh man, I'll have to re-partition:-( |
| 51 |
> Although it borders on a religious argument, many/most agree you always |
| 52 |
> need at least a small amount of swap. |
| 53 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Knowledge_Base:Is_swap_space_really_necessary |
| 54 |
> |
| 55 |
> You can also set up a swap file instead of a swap partition. You'll |
| 56 |
> have to search for instructions, I didn't find it quick enough to |
| 57 |
> include a link. |
| 58 |
> |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
I haven't thought about these things in a long time. I've never had more than 4GB |
| 61 |
of RAM. |
Archives