Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Arttu V." <arttuv69@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] One hard drive much slower for some reason.
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 16:22:54
Message-Id: AANLkTinSnD9asZfUKez5bLwr3m4D6YiOWjeUZJnREF8N@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] One hard drive much slower for some reason. by Dale
1 On 6/2/10, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > smoker-new ~ # smartctl -l selftest /dev/hdb
3 > smartctl version 5.38 [i686-pc-linux-gnu] Copyright (C) 2002-8 Bruce Allen
4 > Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
5 >
6 > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
7 > SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
8 > Num Test_Description Status Remaining
9 > LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error
10 > # 1 Extended offline Completed without error 00%
11 > 1038 -
12 > # 2 Short offline Completed without error 00%
13 > 1037 -
14 > # 3 Extended offline Completed without error 00%
15 > 1075 -
16 > # 4 Extended offline Completed without error 00%
17 > 305 -
18 > # 5 Extended offline Completed without error 00%
19 > 660 -
20 > # 6 Extended offline Completed without error 00%
21 > 213 -
22 > # 7 Extended offline Completed without error 00%
23 > 687 -
24 > # 8 Extended offline Completed without error 00%
25 > 686 -
26 > # 9 Extended offline Completed without error 00%
27 > 629 -
28
29 I was thinking about smartctl -A attributes table (or just plain -a
30 for all), which might've showed a great number of sector relocations
31 or other internal I/O-related issues.
32
33 But this report raises another question: why aren't the reported
34 lifetimes in an ascending list? They jump back and forth.
35
36 --
37 Arttu V.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] One hard drive much slower for some reason. Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>