1 |
Hello, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Sat, 19 Dec 2020, Dale wrote: |
4 |
>A friend donated a older PC to me the other day. It's a fairly nice rig |
5 |
>despite its age. Some specs for those interested but may not matter in |
6 |
>the end. TL;DR, skip to next paragraph. It's a Dell Inspiron 546. AMD |
7 |
>9750 quad core CPU running at 2.4GHz. It currently has 4GBs but |
8 |
|
9 |
Meh. I'm running an Athlon II X2 250, 65W TDP, i.e. same CPU family |
10 |
(0x10/16), running at 3.0 GHz with 4GiB DDR3 RAM ... After (again) |
11 |
over 10 years, I'd like to upgrade again a bit, Ryzen 5000 4-8core |
12 |
w/32GiB RAM like ;) |
13 |
|
14 |
[..] |
15 |
>The power supply was replaced a few years ago. I may buy a new one that |
16 |
>is a little bit larger. It has a 300 watt now, a 400 watt would give |
17 |
>some breathing room for start up power for the extra drives. I haven't |
18 |
>measured the wattage it pulls now. May do that later. |
19 |
|
20 |
Beware: I use a lot of disks and I tried running it with then 8 (or 9? |
21 |
or 10? Lots!) HDDs with a 500W (or even 550W) PSU. System wouldn't |
22 |
reliably boot up. Replaced with a 650W PSU and it's running since |
23 |
(which is, those 10+ years now :) Currently I have a SSD and 7 HDDs |
24 |
(and 2 DVD[1]) ;) |
25 |
|
26 |
Typical spinning rust drives are (or at least were) specced to take up |
27 |
to about 30W while spinning up, ~10-12W-ish on access, ~5-7W-ish while |
28 |
idle. For me, that then was ~240-300W alone for all the drives at |
29 |
power-on. Too much obviously for the 500W PSU along with all the rest |
30 |
of the box also starting ;) |
31 |
|
32 |
I've got a nice Seasonic PSU from Corsair (TX650 v2) (the v1 was some |
33 |
other stuff), only drawback is that it has gotten a bit clogged up |
34 |
with dust and gotten loud and there's no easy way to clean it out (at |
35 |
least without taking it apart) *sigh*... |
36 |
|
37 |
>I'm thinking of making a storage system out of it. I think it is |
38 |
>referred to as a NFS. |
39 |
|
40 |
Nope. NFS is "Network File System". You mean "NAS" = "Network Attached |
41 |
Storage" ;) |
42 |
|
43 |
>It should be plenty fast enough to move data around. Only downside, |
44 |
>not many spaces for hard drives. |
45 |
|
46 |
Also, that Phenom X6 w/ 125W TDP is plenty powerhungry, even at idle |
47 |
(ISTR 50W-ish, while modern stuff can take only 20-10W for the system, |
48 |
aside from the HDDs in both cases). |
49 |
|
50 |
>I see only two spaces for hard drives with one already taken. There |
51 |
>is a open area that I could add a drive cage, I think. May can fit |
52 |
>two or three hard drives in that. There's also a 5 1/4 space too. |
53 |
>Another downside tho, I'm thinking of going to SAS drives. If I can |
54 |
>afford that, it will be a more dependable setup. Of course, that |
55 |
>means I have to add card(s) for the controller(s). It doesn't have a |
56 |
>lot of expansion slots but may be enough. Mobo is only SATA. |
57 |
> |
58 |
>Another option, find another case. If I recall correctly tho, some |
59 |
>puter makers don't use standard layouts for the mobo screw holes. |
60 |
>Anyone know if Dell is a standard ATX or some other screw hole pattern? |
61 |
|
62 |
No idea, but I'd go for a different case. And probably, depending on |
63 |
budget vs. power-consumption (cost) for a different CPU+MoBo+RAM, |
64 |
something like a AMD Ryzen 3 3200G or maybe a x86 Celeron/Pentium/i3... |
65 |
|
66 |
HTH, |
67 |
-dnh |
68 |
|
69 |
[1] too lazy even to unplug the older one |
70 |
|
71 |
-- |
72 |
Actually, NT is more like LSD with all the good effects filtered out. |
73 |
-- Andrew Maddox |