| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 08:23 on Tuesday 17 May 2011, Mick did opine |
| 2 |
thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I had no problem building it on another gentoo box, but this one is |
| 5 |
> giving me a headache. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> All packages build fine until the last package enlightenment and then |
| 8 |
> it fails complaining about ... hal! |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> [snip ...] |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> checking for E_REMOTE... yes |
| 13 |
> checking for E_IMC... yes |
| 14 |
> checking for E_THUMB... yes |
| 15 |
> checking for E_FM... yes |
| 16 |
> checking for E_FM_OP... yes |
| 17 |
> checking for E_FM_OPEN... yes |
| 18 |
> checking for E_SYS... yes |
| 19 |
> checking for E_INIT... yes |
| 20 |
> checking for E... no |
| 21 |
> configure: error: Package requirements ( |
| 22 |
> evas >= 1.0.999 |
| 23 |
> ecore >= 1.0.999 |
| 24 |
> ecore-x >= 1.0.999 |
| 25 |
> ecore-evas >= 1.0.999 |
| 26 |
> ecore-input >= 1.0.999 |
| 27 |
> ecore-input-evas >= 1.0.999 |
| 28 |
> ecore-con >= 1.0.999 |
| 29 |
> ecore-ipc >= 1.0.999 |
| 30 |
> ecore-file >= 1.0.999 |
| 31 |
> eet >= 1.4.0 |
| 32 |
> edje >= 1.0.999 |
| 33 |
> efreet >= 1.0.999 |
| 34 |
> efreet-mime >= 1.0.999 |
| 35 |
> efreet-trash >= 1.0.999 |
| 36 |
> eina >= 1.0.999 |
| 37 |
> dbus-1 |
| 38 |
> edbus >= 1.0.999 |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> eukit >= 1.0.999 |
| 42 |
> ehal |
| 43 |
> ) were not met: |
| 44 |
> |
| 45 |
> No package 'ehal' found |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
e17 from svn works fine here. |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
What version are you trying to install? When emerge ran, did it check out the |
| 50 |
latest code for first first? |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
The hal stuff in e17 has been iffy for a while. |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
-- |
| 56 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives