1 |
Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 22:20 on Tuesday 31 May 2011, Nils Larsson did |
3 |
> opine thusly: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>> tisdagen den 31 maj 2011 22:00:28 skrev Dale: |
7 |
>> |
8 |
>>> Does anyone remember the discussion I had about kde packages being in |
9 |
>>> the system set when doing a emerge -e system? If I for example unmerge |
10 |
>>> kde-meta then run --depclean, I bet I would get the error about system |
11 |
>>> packages being removed. It may be because of USE flags but this was |
12 |
>>> what I was concerned about during the last discussion. Having GUI |
13 |
>>> packages, especially KDE, included in the system set, even if because of |
14 |
>>> USE flags, is going to lead to problems at some point. |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> Or maybe I am reading all this wrong? |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> Dale |
19 |
>>> |
20 |
>> I assume you have "kde" enabled on sys-auth/polkit, that pulls in sys- |
21 |
>> auth/polkit-kde-agent and sys-auth/polkit-kde. Thats all the qt-* and |
22 |
>> kdelibs packages. |
23 |
>> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> It appears I was wrong after all. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Manners dictates that apologies to Dale are in order. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Sorry Dale. |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
No need. I'm more worried about the heat over here. It's going to be |
34 |
100F tomorrow. My poor garden is starting to cook the food as well as |
35 |
grow it. O_O I just need to explain it better from now on. ;-) |
36 |
|
37 |
Now, I bet there is no way to get KDE stuff out of that either. I guess |
38 |
one could disable the flags that pull them in but what would that take |
39 |
away from KDE? Then again, doesn't KDE require polkit now? If so, that |
40 |
can't be removed not without some teeth pulling at least. Those pesky |
41 |
USE flags. lol |
42 |
|
43 |
< sighs > |
44 |
|
45 |
Dale |
46 |
|
47 |
:-) :-) |