1 |
Samuli Suominen wrote: |
2 |
> On 02/08/13 08:28, Dale wrote: |
3 |
>> Samuli Suominen wrote: |
4 |
>>> |
5 |
>>> Except it isn't because as already explained, eudev makes additional |
6 |
>>> changes on top of udev changes. |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> Which is true. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Let's see them. I'll help you: |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=eudev&list_id=1920856 |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Help yourself instead and use correct search parameters, like below... |
16 |
> |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>>> let's see them. Based on your posts, there should be plenty of them. |
19 |
>>>> Funny I haven't ran into any of them yet tho. |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>>> I'm not suprised, because the current status is so similar between |
22 |
>>> udev vs. eudev. Only regression that's known currently is |
23 |
>>> IUSE="+rule-generator" that doesn't do it's job correctly and |
24 |
>>> 70-persistent-net.rules it is generating can't be trusted. |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> So still no links to any bug reports that are eudev specific huh? See |
27 |
>> above. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Search bugzilla for udev-bugs@g.o and 90% of them apply also to |
30 |
> eudev. |
31 |
> Search bugzilla for eudev@g.o and those all apply. |
32 |
> Search eudev github page Tickets and those all apply. |
33 |
|
34 |
You mean like this: |
35 |
|
36 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=eudev%40gentoo.org&list_id=1921198 |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
Results: |
40 |
|
41 |
"Zarro Boogs found." |
42 |
|
43 |
No open bugs!! When I look for open bugs for a package, I look for the |
44 |
package name itself. That has worked for ages and my search actually |
45 |
did turn up one stable request where yours didn't. |
46 |
|
47 |
> |
48 |
>>> |
49 |
>>>> Here is the deal OK. Udev went in a direction I do NOT like. |
50 |
>>> |
51 |
>>> What direction is that? Everything same is in sys-fs/udev than is in |
52 |
>>> sys-fs/eudev, except the buggy rule-generator. |
53 |
>>> |
54 |
>>>> I CHOSE not to use it and plan to not use it. I PREFER eudev whether |
55 |
>>>> you like |
56 |
>>>> that decision or not. I also plan to use eudev as long as it |
57 |
>>>> serves my |
58 |
>>>> needs as I suspect others will as well. You can preach FUD all you |
59 |
>>>> want |
60 |
>>>> but it works here for me and as others have posted, it works fine for |
61 |
>>>> them. The OP asked for assistance in switching to eudev not for |
62 |
>>>> you to |
63 |
>>>> second guess their choice or to second guess anyone else who |
64 |
>>>> chooses to |
65 |
>>>> use it. |
66 |
>>> |
67 |
>>> I feel pity for you, too bad the eudev in tree causes such level of |
68 |
>>> ignorance. |
69 |
>>> |
70 |
>>> - Samuli |
71 |
>>> |
72 |
>>> |
73 |
>> |
74 |
>> |
75 |
>> Here is some FUD for you. Eudev just left beta. From the eudev |
76 |
>> changelog. |
77 |
>> |
78 |
>> *eudev-1.2 (01 Aug 2013) |
79 |
>> |
80 |
>> 01 Aug 2013; Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> +eudev-1.2.ebuild, |
81 |
>> -eudev-1.2_beta.ebuild: |
82 |
>> version bump, remove beta |
83 |
> |
84 |
> And how did they get there? |
85 |
> By udev maintainers forcing them to upgrade to the new keymap hwdb |
86 |
> which required version to be raised to up-to-par with udev-206. |
87 |
> |
88 |
> Anyway, have fun with pointless udev fork which will never be the |
89 |
> default. I don't care if you don't want the system up-to-par with |
90 |
> production level system. :-) |
91 |
> |
92 |
> - Samuli |
93 |
> |
94 |
> |
95 |
|
96 |
They got there by fixing issues and it reaching stable. That is how |
97 |
they got there. You don't know that and you are telling others what to |
98 |
use for their system? Really? Who exactly do you think you are |
99 |
anyway? Did someone appoint you Gentoo King or something? Here is |
100 |
where we will always differ, I decide on my machine what I use, NOT |
101 |
YOU. If I don't like a piece of software and CHOSE to use something |
102 |
else, you don't get a say in the matter. Got it? Eudev forked from |
103 |
udev, get over it. |
104 |
|
105 |
I'm not in the mood for someone shoving something down my throat. That |
106 |
goes for Lennart and you too. I use eudev, and I plan to do so as long |
107 |
as it serves my needs. The only one spreading FUD here is you. |
108 |
|
109 |
Since you are way off the mark of what the OP asked for, why not go |
110 |
write a blog or something. Maybe go write a blog for Lennart instead of |
111 |
trying to push your agenda here. The OP came here for help to switch to |
112 |
eudev not to hear you shove your agenda. He/she already made their |
113 |
choice as have others. |
114 |
|
115 |
Dale |
116 |
|
117 |
:-) :-) |
118 |
|
119 |
-- |
120 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |