| 1 |
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/01/2009 07:50 AM, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Hi, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> I'm thinking about upgrading to gcc-4.4 and was wondering if anyone here |
| 6 |
>> is using it and if they are having any problems with it. I'm using a |
| 7 |
>> desktop system with KDE and OOo as the biggest packages. No servers or |
| 8 |
>> anything to worry about like apache. Also using 2.6.30-gentoo-r6 for my |
| 9 |
>> kernel. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> If you are using this with no problems, please let me know that and |
| 12 |
>> whether you have a similar setup. My last gcc upgrade was no fun. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Lots of people are using it. It looks pretty good; here's a bug that |
| 15 |
> tracks stuff broken with 4.4: |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249226 |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> As you can see, the vast majority of them have been fixed. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
It does look pretty good. Hopefully this will be better than the last |
| 25 |
upgrade. Seamonkey went goofy and I couldn't compile a kernel at all. |
| 26 |
I don't know what happened. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Giving this some more thought before jumping in tho. ;-) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Thanks much. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Dale |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
:-) :-) |
Archives