| 1 |
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:37:47 +0100, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > I'm not saying that the extraction method is important, but that |
| 4 |
> > someone has got it to run and detailed the steps in the bug report. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Well, let's not fight, but his steps are at least as detailed |
| 7 |
> as what I've written here :) Granted, he wrote that he also |
| 8 |
> created desktop files - that's something, I haven't done. |
| 9 |
> But I think, that's at as important as the way the stuff was |
| 10 |
> extracted, don't you think? :) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'm not fighting, merely pointing out reports from two people that they |
| 13 |
got it to work :( |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Windows Error #56: Operator fell asleep while waiting. |
Archives