1 |
On Monday, June 02, 2014 07:28:53 AM Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
3 |
> > On Mon, 02 Jun 2014 05:27:44 -0500, Dale wrote: |
4 |
> >> The second option does sound what I am looking for. Basically, if I log |
5 |
> >> out but leave my computer on, leave home, some crook/NSA type breaks in |
6 |
> >> and tries to access something or steals my whole puter, they would just |
7 |
> >> get garbage for data. That seems to fit the second option best. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > If they steal your computer they will have to power it off, unless you |
10 |
> > are kind enough to leave them a large enough UPS to steal along with it, |
11 |
> > so any encryption will be equally effective. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> If you're worried about casual thieves then just about any kind of |
14 |
> properly-implemented encryption will stop them. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> If you're worried about a government official specifically tasked with |
17 |
> retrieving your computer, my understanding is that it is SOP these |
18 |
> days to retrieve your computer without powering it off for just this |
19 |
> reason. They won't use your UPS to do it. Typically they remove the |
20 |
> plug just far enough to expose the prongs, slide in a connector that |
21 |
> connects it to a UPS, and then they pull it out the rest of the way |
22 |
> now powered by the UPS. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> See something like: |
25 |
> http://www.cru-inc.com/products/wiebetech/hotplug_field_kit/ |
26 |
|
27 |
Hmm... Those are nice, but can be easily built yourself with an off-the-shelf |
28 |
UPS. |
29 |
|
30 |
> Presumably somebody who is determined will also have the means to |
31 |
> retrieve the contents of RAM once they seize your computer. Besides |
32 |
> directlly accessing the memory bus I think most motherboards are not |
33 |
> designed to be secure against attacks from PCI/firewire/etc. |
34 |
|
35 |
Hmm... add something to auto-shutdown the computer when a hotplug event occurs |
36 |
on any of the internal ports and remove support for unused ports from the |
37 |
kernel. |
38 |
|
39 |
I wonder how they'd keep a computer from initiating a shutdown procedure or |
40 |
causing a kernel panic when it looses (wireless) connection to another device |
41 |
that is unlikely to be moved when powered up? |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
Joost |