| 1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:14 on Wednesday 08 September 2010, Grant |
| 2 |
Edwards did opine thusly: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 2010-09-08, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > I need to shut up now. My hatred of pixelated display devices is |
| 6 |
> > showing. I accept an LCD for my notebook as CRTs just don't fit, but |
| 7 |
> > nothing beats a real CRT imho for image quality. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I presume you mean a nice monochrome display not one of those fuzzy |
| 10 |
> color things with the individual phosphor dots/bars on the screen. It |
| 11 |
> was a sad day I was finally forced to give up my big, razor-sharp Sun |
| 12 |
> grayscale monitor for one of those small, fuzzy-looking, color things. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
No, I mean insanely high quality colour CRTs with out of this world dpi. The |
| 15 |
kind where you cannot discern individual triads at normal viewing distance. |
| 16 |
Not quite medical quality (I'm not that crazy) but close. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Like I said in my response to Paul, a poor colour CRT has got to be the worst |
| 19 |
thing out there. Most of those colour things are like that. But the opposite |
| 20 |
does exist. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
Archives