1 |
On Thursday 28 February 2008 04:58:32 pm ionut cucu wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:51:59 -0500 |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@×××××××.net> wrote: |
5 |
> > On Thursday 28 February 2008 04:19:22 pm ionut cucu wrote: |
6 |
> > > I'm running sshfs very often and I've noticed the following issue: |
7 |
> > > whenever the hub/swich(what ever is that keeping my lan together) |
8 |
> > > suddenly stops working while I'm using sshfs my computer crashes, |
9 |
> > > or if I;m lucky enough I get to do an umount before everything |
10 |
> > > falls. Is there any way to prevent this? |
11 |
> > > Also since this is a lan is there a null encryption algorithm I |
12 |
> > > could use to speed things up a bit? Or lower the CPU usage? |
13 |
> > > Thanks! |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Dude... time for a new switch... |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Yeah well it's a campus *(1) switch, the campus's *(2) lan, the |
18 |
> campus's *(3) gateway....so on so forth till the A class IP so I can do |
19 |
> nothing about it |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Note *(1) to *(2) are ugly words and shouldn't be used around children |
22 |
|
23 |
Hmmm no help.... |
24 |
|
25 |
How about this? |
26 |
|
27 |
http://fuse.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/SshfsFaq |
28 |
|
29 |
Has a section concerning "locking up"... |
30 |
|
31 |
Also... how about reporting a bug to the developer? |
32 |
Send bug reports to fuse-sshfs@×××××××××××××××××.net. |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
I just glossed over the documentation and saw no mention of a null encryption |
36 |
engine. If you are willing to use no encryption... maybe you should try |
37 |
another transport protocol... NFS works well. |
38 |
|
39 |
Also sshfs runs via the FUSE architecture.... Not well know for performance, |
40 |
more for "as a means to an end" and it runs slow too. |
41 |
|
42 |
Cheers. |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
From the Desk of: Jerome D. McBride |
55 |
-- |
56 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |