| 1 |
$ emerge -p netscape-flash |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "netscape-flash" have been masked. |
| 4 |
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your |
| 5 |
!!! request: |
| 6 |
- net-www/netscape-flash-9.0.48.0 (masked by: package.mask) |
| 7 |
# Olivier Crête <tester [at] gentoo [dot] org> (14 Jul 1007) |
| 8 |
# We can't mirror. Different upstream mirrors have different versions |
| 9 |
# and the tarballs are unversioned |
| 10 |
# And the older versions are affected by critical remote security |
| 11 |
# vulnerability |
| 12 |
# See Gentoo bug #185141 |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
----- |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I emerged netscape-flash-9.0.48.0 before it was masked. I assume that |
| 17 |
emerge got the correct tarball, else it would have been caught by the |
| 18 |
checksum checking, and because about:plugins in Firefox says |
| 19 |
"File name: libflashplayer.so Shockwave Flash 9.0 r48". |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I guess I'm seeking reassurance that my understanding is correct, that |
| 22 |
I have the version with the vulnerability fixed. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
»Q« |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives