| 1 |
Jacques Montier wrote: |
| 2 |
> Le 18/02/2012 14:51, Dale a écrit : |
| 3 |
>> Jacques Montier wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Le 18/02/2012 13:54, Neil Bothwick a écrit : |
| 5 |
>>>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>>> I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it |
| 8 |
>>>>> does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64. |
| 9 |
>>>>> I get "instruction not permitted". |
| 10 |
>>>>> So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4. |
| 11 |
>>>> It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7. |
| 12 |
>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you |
| 14 |
>>>> can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-) |
| 15 |
>>>> |
| 16 |
>>>> |
| 17 |
>>> Before ie7, i had an 10 year-old PC, and it was 5 or 6 hours compiling |
| 18 |
>>> Openoffice... |
| 19 |
>>> Let's try now...;-) |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>>> Thanks, |
| 22 |
>>> |
| 23 |
>>> Cheers, |
| 24 |
>>> |
| 25 |
>>> -- |
| 26 |
>>> Jacques |
| 27 |
>>> |
| 28 |
>> Chew on this one. This is for my old rig: |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> Thu Dec 22 06:27:17 2011 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r1 |
| 31 |
>> merge time: 18 hours, 46 minutes and 20 seconds. |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
>> I just love updating that old thing. lol |
| 34 |
>> |
| 35 |
>> Dale |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
>> :-) :-) |
| 38 |
>> |
| 39 |
>> |
| 40 |
> Yes, |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> It was worth changing a use flag then :-) |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> -- |
| 45 |
> Jacques |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
Funny thing is, I updated that a week or so ago. It took 3 tries to get |
| 49 |
LOo to compile and finish. Is it just me or do they always seem to fail |
| 50 |
right at the end? ROLF |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
Dale |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
:-) :-) |
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
-- |
| 58 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or |
| 59 |
how you interpreted my words! |
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
Miss the compile output? Hint: |
| 62 |
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n" |
Archives