1 |
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:26:02 -0600 |
2 |
Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Howdy, |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I ran across this and though it was a joke. Did a news search and |
7 |
> sure enough, it is reported in lots of places. Random linky: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2102856/Will-FBI-shut-Internet-March-8-virus-concerns.html?ito=feeds-newsxml |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Is there any truth to this mess? My bigger and better question, how |
12 |
> is shutting down the internet going to fix this? When the net comes |
13 |
> back up, they are still going to be infected. Right? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I'm glad I run a really nice Linux OS. |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
Gawd, I hate it when morons write sensational articles that attempt to |
19 |
make sense to other morons. You get crap like that. |
20 |
|
21 |
So if this is legit, and I'm not saying it is, what happened is this: |
22 |
|
23 |
The malware changes the DNS cache settings on infected machines, |
24 |
sending the user to rogue caches. The FBI captured some (or all) of |
25 |
these rogue caches and (possibly) tried to fix them. A court has now |
26 |
said those rogue caches must now be shut down. |
27 |
|
28 |
So if the morons reading the article do nothing, on March 8 the DNS |
29 |
caches they use will be down. The user's DNS will not work. |
30 |
|
31 |
OMFG!!!!!!! Da intartubes is broken!!!!! |
32 |
|
33 |
<sigh> |
34 |
|
35 |
Instead, why not just set the DNS caches to something NOT owned by Ivan |
36 |
The Russian Spammer? |
37 |
|
38 |
And no, the intartubes will NOT be switched off. |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
Alan McKinnnon |
45 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |