From: | Peter Alfredsen <loki_val@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] nanosleep broken on ~amd64? | ||
Date: | Sun, 03 May 2009 22:35:24 | ||
Message-Id: | 20090504003333.63eb82f6@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] nanosleep broken on ~amd64? by walt |
1 | On Sun, 03 May 2009 14:14:38 -0700 |
2 | walt <w41ter@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > By accident I noticed that the configure script for one of the gentoo |
5 | > packages (I think maybe it was coreutils but I can't remember) gives |
6 | > different results on ~x86 and ~amd64. |
7 | > |
8 | > The script uses a "test for working nanosleep" that I've included |
9 | > below. |
10 | > |
11 | > Could someone else compile the test and confirm that it returns 119 on |
12 | > ~amd64 instead of 0? |
13 | |
14 | ~amd64, returns 119 |
15 | |
16 | /loki_val |