Archives
Archives
| From: | Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} SSD instead of RAID1? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:15:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20090729191540.4685c378@krikkit.digimed.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} SSD instead of RAID1? by Grant |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:20:53 -0700, Grant wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Anyway, the point of all this is to prevent an HD failure from |
| 4 | > stopping the system. An SSD is much safer, right? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | SSDs are still relatively new technology, so predicting failure rates is |
| 7 | less reliable. What's wrong with using RAID-1? It's proven technology and |
| 8 | totally resistant to a single HD failure. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Neil Bothwick |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Why do Kennedy's cry after sex? ..... Mace! |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} SSD instead of RAID1? | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} SSD instead of RAID1? | Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> |