1 |
on Friday 04/18/2008 Neil Bothwick(neil@××××××××××.uk) wrote |
2 |
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:34:49 +0200, Remy Blank wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > There are at least two drawbacks to using rsync for mirroring the local |
5 |
> > backup to a remote host: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > - If your local backup becomes corrupt, then so does your remote |
8 |
> > backup, except if you are quick enough to disable the rsync step. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> That's a potential problem with any form of backup, local or remote. The |
11 |
> truly paranoid would use two different backup methods on two physically |
12 |
> separate destinations. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> > - If you have disconnection during the rsync step (happened to me |
15 |
> > last night), your remote backup is temporarily corrupted. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> That should be fixable by having the script that runs rsync check the |
18 |
> return value and try again if it fails. |
19 |
|
20 |
Would not these problems be solved by something like rdiff-backup |
21 |
which I have been using for a short time. Its not encrypted, however |
22 |
and I am not sure what happened to the developer, but it does seem to |
23 |
work. |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
27 |
How do |
28 |
you spend it? |
29 |
|
30 |
John Covici |
31 |
covici@××××××××××.com |
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |