1 |
Stuart Howard <stuart.g.howard <at> gmail.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> This link to the forum though I realise it is nvidia based it may give |
5 |
> some further information the posts refer to a bug which further refers |
6 |
> to another bug which is the ATI issue but the general point is there. |
7 |
|
8 |
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-556528-highlight-nvidia+block.html |
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
Hello Stuart, |
12 |
|
13 |
Interesting reading. Here's what I currently used on my system: |
14 |
|
15 |
x11-base/xorg-server Installed versions: 1.1.1-r1 |
16 |
|
17 |
x11-drivers/ati-drivers Installed versions: 8.35.5 |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
This all works with my ATI 1900XT card (glx gears runs |
21 |
on a full 22 inch widescreen (1680 x 1050) at 1800 FPS. |
22 |
The little default 2x2 runs glxgears at 11,000 FPS. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
This might explain why every permutaion of ati-drivers |
26 |
and xorg-server that I entered into /etc/portage/package.mask |
27 |
does not neutralize the request to upgrade xorg-server to 1.3.0.0 |
28 |
|
29 |
## I tried every permutation possible here, nothings masks |
30 |
##the upgrade request so I can continue with routine upgrades |
31 |
<=x11-base/xorg-server-1.1.1-r1 |
32 |
>=x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.32.5 |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
blocks B x11-drivers/ati-drivers ( |
36 |
is blocking x11-base/xorg-server-1.3.0.0) |
37 |
|
38 |
I did not glean from the discussion how to neutralize the erroneous |
39 |
upgrade request so I can perform the other upgrades. Any ideas on that? |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
James |
44 |
|
45 |
-- |
46 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |