| 1 |
Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 30 November 2006 10:22, Jorge Almeida wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Dale wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> used epiphany before. What's it look like? |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>> Have no idea, I didn't tried either. Being something from Gnome, I |
| 10 |
>> suspect it's not very customizable, but I may be completely wrong. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> You can find more info here: |
| 14 |
> http://www.gnome.org/projects/epiphany/ |
| 15 |
> seems that it uses the gecko rendering engine, the same used by firefox |
| 16 |
> and seamonkey (and can use the plugins too). Like many Gnome programs, |
| 17 |
> it aims to be simple, easy to use and probably not very customizable (no |
| 18 |
> flames, just my impression). |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If all apps were like Epiphany, Gnome wouldn't be beaten around that |
| 22 |
much, me thinks (and I wouldn't use ROX-Filer instead of Nautilus). If |
| 23 |
you want to try something fresh, perhaps you find this article gives you |
| 24 |
an impulse: |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
http://ploum.frimouvy.org/?2006/03/15/100-why-you-should-try-epiphany-as-your-default-browser-with-gnome-214 |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Regards, |
| 29 |
Thomas |
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives