Archives
Archives
| From: | James Broadhead <jamesbroadhead@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? | ||
| Date: | Tue, 06 Sep 2011 19:38:01 | ||
| Message-Id: | CA+hid6FdUCPX1vjtpRJ=_nMvFN2LaEc3jCkcbkQan2v779O4-w@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? by Alan Mackenzie |
||
| 1 | On 6 September 2011 19:57, Alan Mackenzie <acm@×××.de> wrote: |
| 2 | > The support for lpr exists. It's being removed, for some reason. Given |
| 3 | > that printing works by constructing a postscript equivalent of the thing |
| 4 | > being printed, just how difficult can it be to squirt this postscript |
| 5 | > down lpr rather than the cups equivalent? How long does it take to write |
| 6 | > a C++ `if' statement? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | We're all happily waiting for you to do it ... time yourself! :) |