Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:54:24
Message-Id: 4F3FACF8.7040303@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? by Jacques Montier
1 Jacques Montier wrote:
2 > Le 18/02/2012 13:54, Neil Bothwick a écrit :
3 >> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote:
4 >>
5 >>> I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it
6 >>> does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64.
7 >>> I get "instruction not permitted".
8 >>> So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4.
9 >> It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7.
10 >>
11 >> Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you
12 >> can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-)
13 >>
14 >>
15 >
16 > Before ie7, i had an 10 year-old PC, and it was 5 or 6 hours compiling
17 > Openoffice...
18 > Let's try now...;-)
19 >
20 > Thanks,
21 >
22 > Cheers,
23 >
24 > --
25 > Jacques
26 >
27
28 Chew on this one. This is for my old rig:
29
30 Thu Dec 22 06:27:17 2011 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r1
31 merge time: 18 hours, 46 minutes and 20 seconds.
32
33 I just love updating that old thing. lol
34
35 Dale
36
37 :-) :-)
38
39
40 --
41 I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
42 how you interpreted my words!
43
44 Miss the compile output? Hint:
45 EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? Jacques Montier <jmontier@×××××.com>