Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: No HW acceleraton on radeon Mobility X300 with linux-2.6.36-r5, mesa-7.9, xorg-server-1.9.2 and video-ati-6.13.2
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:08:40
Message-Id: AANLkTik-WLaNSLfmOuU1qkLij_gWkO1vC4ER5cSM3ZxE@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: No HW acceleraton on radeon Mobility X300 with linux-2.6.36-r5, mesa-7.9, xorg-server-1.9.2 and video-ati-6.13.2 by Daniel Tihelka
1 On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Daniel Tihelka <dtihelka@×××××.com> wrote:
2 >
3 >
4 > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote:
5 <SNIP>
6 >>
7 >>   What do you see in glxgears?
8 >>
9 > I see this:
10 > Running synchronized to the vertical refresh.  The framerate should be
11 > approximately the same as the monitor refresh rate.
12
13
14 I get this same message on my Intel graphics machine, and I get the
15 same frame rates which is what the message says...
16
17 > 273 frames in 5.0 seconds = 54.532 FPS
18 > 299 frames in 5.0 seconds = 59.634 FPS
19 > 301 frames in 5.0 seconds = 60.037 FPS
20 > 288 frames in 5.1 seconds = 56.852 FPS
21 > 212 frames in 5.0 seconds = 42.366 FPS  <-- window maximized from here
22 > 222 frames in 5.0 seconds = 44.352 FPS
23 > 216 frames in 5.0 seconds = 43.021 FPS
24 > 205 frames in 5.0 seconds = 40.716 FPS
25 >
26 > It is not so much and I don't know if it is the top performance of the
27 > gallium driver (btw, I really believe it has large potential), or if it
28 > could be improved further more (e.g. by compilling lvm into it), but it is
29 > not critical for me now.
30 > Dan
31 >
32
33 My ATI doesn't have the 'Running synchronized to the vertical refresh'
34 message. It does about 200FPS. On my wife's box I used the closed
35 source nvidia driver and get about 2500 FPS.
36
37 - Mark

Replies