Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: burlingk@×××××××××.mil
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 01:06:31
Message-Id: AA0639A1EB70AE409130258CE7BDC31806646B96@messenger.cv63.navy.mil
1 > -----Original Message-----
2 > From: Norberto Bensa [mailto:nbensa@×××.net]
3 > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 9:29 AM
4 > To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
5 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20
6 >
7 >
8 > Ali Polatel wrote:
9 > > You should use unionfs version 2.0 which is a part of -mm
10 > tree. You
11 > > can either get mm-sources or manually patch your kernel.
12 > Have a look
13 > > at http://www.am-utils.org/project-unionfs.html for more info..
14 >
15 > But there's no unionfs-utils unless you're using sabayon overlay...
16 >
17 > Regards,
18 > Norberto
19 > --
20 > gentoo-user@g.o mailing list
21
22 I have seen many people mentioning UnionFS.
23 What exactly is it, and what does it do?
24 (:P Besides the statement that it is an FS.)
25 --
26 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20 Norberto Bensa <nbensa@×××.net>
[gentoo-user] Re: Unionfs for 2.6.20 Ali Polatel <polatel@×××××.com>