1 |
On Sunday 16 Jul 2017 10:59:21 tuxic@××××××.de wrote: |
2 |
> On 07/16 10:48, tuxic@××××××.de wrote: |
3 |
> > On 07/16 09:18, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
4 |
> > > On Sunday 16 Jul 2017 09:59:54 tuxic@××××××.de wrote: |
5 |
> > > > On 07/16 08:51, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
6 |
> > > --->8 |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > > > Have you tried Ghostery? |
9 |
> > > > > |
10 |
> > > > > http://www.ghostery.com |
11 |
> > > > |
12 |
> > > > Hi Peter, |
13 |
> > > > |
14 |
> > > > no, due to this reason: |
15 |
> > > > |
16 |
> > > > "Ghostery is owned by Evidon, a company that collects and provides |
17 |
> > > > data to advertising companies." Source here: |
18 |
> > > > https://lifehacker.com/ad-blocking-extension-ghostery-actually-sells |
19 |
> > > > -data-> to-a-514417864> > |
20 |
> > > I hadn't read that; interesting. But note that it only says your data |
21 |
> > > are |
22 |
> > > collected if you choose to "support" them, and apparently the data are |
23 |
> > > anonymised. Actually, when I looked just now I found that choice made |
24 |
> > > for me by default. I've now changed it - thanks for the pointer! |
25 |
> > > |
26 |
> > > I'll continue to use Ghostery for the moment, as it seems highly |
27 |
> > > effective in stopping all manner of intrusions. |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > Hi Peter, |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > How far would you trust a company, which makes money from selling |
32 |
> > my/your data and is promoting a tool to prevent exactly this? |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > Me: Not a single radius/wave length of a quantum... |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > "Anonymised data" is a bad joke in post Orwell times... |
37 |
> > |
38 |
> > Cheers |
39 |
> > Meino |
40 |
> |
41 |
> See also here: |
42 |
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghostery |
43 |
> |
44 |
> cite: |
45 |
> "Some say that Ghostery, Inc. plays a dual role in the online |
46 |
> advertising industry. Ghostery blocks sites from gathering personal |
47 |
> information. But it does have an opt-in feature GhostRank that can be |
48 |
> checked to "support" them. GhostRank takes note of ads encountered and |
49 |
> blocked, and sends that information back to advertisers so they can |
50 |
> better formulate their ads to avoid being blocked.[22] Though Ghostery |
51 |
> claims that the data are anonymized, patterns of web page visits |
52 |
> cannot truly be anonymized.[23] Thus not everyone sees Evidon's |
53 |
> business model as conflict-free. "Evidon has a financial incentive to |
54 |
> encourage the program's adoption and discourage alternatives like Do |
55 |
> Not Track and cookie blocking as well as to maintain positive |
56 |
> relationships with intrusive advertising companies," says Jonathan |
57 |
> Mayer, a Stanford grad student and privacy advocate." |
58 |
|
59 |
Hmm. Plenty to think about there. |
60 |
|
61 |
-- |
62 |
Regards |
63 |
Peter |