1 |
Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:11 PM, <covici@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > > Also, as Rich said, if you wait it's possible that systemd (and/or |
6 |
> dracut) |
7 |
> > > will drop you into a rescue shell anyway. Unfortunately, thanks to very |
8 |
> > > slow hardware in the wild, the timeout has been increased to three |
9 |
> minutes, |
10 |
> > > and I believe those are *per hardware unit*. So if you have five disks, |
11 |
> in |
12 |
> > > theory it could take fifteen minutes to get you to a rescue shell. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Thanks much. Does the rescue target try to mount all the disks? Also, |
15 |
> > I would still like to get in touch with the dracut devs -- although I |
16 |
> > may never make that particular mistake again, but maybe other things |
17 |
> > will happen. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> As I said in my previous mail: emergency mounts the root filesystem |
20 |
> read-only; rescue mounts all the filesystems read/write. If dracut cannot |
21 |
> mount the root filesystem, it *WILL* drop you to a shell, but it will take |
22 |
> some time while all the timeouts expire. This could be *several* minutes |
23 |
> depending on hardware. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> The dracut mailing list is in [1]. |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Regards. |
28 |
|
29 |
OK, thanks much. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
33 |
How do |
34 |
you spend it? |
35 |
|
36 |
John Covici |
37 |
covici@××××××××××.com |