1 |
Am 03.08.2010 16:11, schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer: |
2 |
> Am Dienstag, 3. August 2010, 08:31:38 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: |
3 |
>> On 08/03/2010 08:03 AM, Sebastián Ramírez Magrí wrote: |
4 |
[...] |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> Git needs to move much less data around than rsync. It only transfers |
7 |
>> differences, not whole files. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Not true. rsync uses delta-encoding to minimize data transfers. |
10 |
> |
11 |
|
12 |
Not necessarily true: Many (all?) public gentoo mirrors deactivate |
13 |
delta-encoding in order to limit CPU-utilization. I would also guess |
14 |
that git's delta encoding has a much finer granularity because it works |
15 |
on lines (in text files) while rsync is designed to work on binary data. |