| 1 |
On Friday 16 February 2007 09:19:11 brullo nulla wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ok. Now the question is: is the new dbus really installable indeed? I |
| 3 |
> think "yes" from your explanation, but I want to be triple-sure. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Of course. You showed that when you provided `emerge -pv dbus` (it didn't say |
| 6 |
masked by anything)... |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> (In fact, a self-blocking packages looked very odd to me, but...) |
| 9 |
> (and why has been 0.62-r2 been hard masked so fast?) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
What is often referred to as hard masked isn't the same as masked by missing |
| 12 |
keyword. Also it wasn't *that* fast. But short answer: because the maintainer |
| 13 |
doesn't want to maintain old software... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Bo Andresen |
Archives