Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Ernie Schroder <schroder@×××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:41:37
Message-Id: 200511300935.48561.schroder@ntplx.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary by Neil Bothwick
1 On Wednesday 30 November 2005 09:18 am, a tiny voice compelled Neil Bothwick
2 to write:
3 > Except that you don't sit and watch it compile (unless you are
4 > exceptionally sad
5
6
7 You mean you don't have to keep watch over long compiles? I guess I have no
8 life.
9 Actually Neil, you're right, the 8 hours that it takes to build OO is not down
10 time, but try playing poker on-line while it's running. I can never remember
11 to do those long builds while I sleep so I end up, in this case, and for
12 firefox, going for the immediate gratification.
13 --
14 Regards, Ernie
15 100% Microsoft and Intel free
16
17 09:29:51 up 19:16, 5 users, load average: 0.06, 0.16, 0.32
18 Linux 2.6.5-gentoo-r1 i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2400+
19 --
20 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman <buanzo@××××××××××.ar>
Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] openoffice 2.0 - compiling or binary Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net>