1 |
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:31:26 +0100 Kai Krakow wrote: |
2 |
> Am Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:02:47 +0300 |
3 |
> schrieb Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o>: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > I have thoughts about caching NFS using filescached, but limited |
6 |
> > durability of the drive (400 TBW warranty for 512 GB size) restrains |
7 |
> > me here. Probably I'll use it for caching only in exceptional cases |
8 |
> > (e.g. slow remote mounts like AFS), but with 64 GB RAM I doubt I'll |
9 |
> > need additional NVMe-based caching, at least for now, with time |
10 |
> > this may change of course. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Take note, that filescached may not support every filesystem for cache |
13 |
> storage - e.g. btrfs cannot be used for it currently. I haven't looked |
14 |
> at other options yet. |
15 |
|
16 |
cachefilesd needs user_xattr feature, both ext4 and f2fs have it. |
17 |
|
18 |
Btrfs people claim that fs lacks this option because functionality |
19 |
is enabled by default: |
20 |
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg06814.html |
21 |
|
22 |
But I haven't tested this myself. |
23 |
|
24 |
Best regards, |
25 |
Andrew Savchenko |