| 1 |
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:31:26 +0100 Kai Krakow wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:02:47 +0300 |
| 3 |
> schrieb Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o>: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > I have thoughts about caching NFS using filescached, but limited |
| 6 |
> > durability of the drive (400 TBW warranty for 512 GB size) restrains |
| 7 |
> > me here. Probably I'll use it for caching only in exceptional cases |
| 8 |
> > (e.g. slow remote mounts like AFS), but with 64 GB RAM I doubt I'll |
| 9 |
> > need additional NVMe-based caching, at least for now, with time |
| 10 |
> > this may change of course. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Take note, that filescached may not support every filesystem for cache |
| 13 |
> storage - e.g. btrfs cannot be used for it currently. I haven't looked |
| 14 |
> at other options yet. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
cachefilesd needs user_xattr feature, both ext4 and f2fs have it. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Btrfs people claim that fs lacks this option because functionality |
| 19 |
is enabled by default: |
| 20 |
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg06814.html |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
But I haven't tested this myself. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Best regards, |
| 25 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives