Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] New Gentoo system has become unstable and unusable - help, please!
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:13:43
Message-Id: 1265965991.825.10.camel@rattus
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] New Gentoo system has become unstable and unusable - help, please! by Alan McKinnon
1 I am (was) getting this as well on a new amd64 install (zotac ION n330)
2 - it appears there is a problem with certain glibc 32bit libraries -
3 there is a bug about it. Upgraded glibc and most things are now happy -
4 but I still cant build gcc.
5
6 BillK
7
8
9
10 On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 10:50 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
11 > On Friday 12 February 2010 10:54:53 Alan Mackenzie wrote:
12 > > Hi, Gentoo,
13 > >
14 > > My new Gentoo box has become unusably unstable.
15 > >
16 > > The first sign was when the compiler threw a segfault whilst emerging
17 > > the xfce window manager. I "solved" this by emerging Openbox instead.
18 > >
19 > > Then I got another compiler segfault whilst emerging firefox (yes, I
20 > > know there's a binary for this).
21 >
22 >
23 >
24 > everything you mention below is indicative of failing hardware, especially RAM
25 > closely followed by PSU.
26 >
27 > Swap them out with known good items and test thoroughly *before* doing
28 > anything else.
29 >
30 >
31 >
32 >
33 >
34 > >
35 > > Then, on somebody's advice (not fully understood), I did
36 > >
37 > > # emerge -e gcc
38 > >
39 > > , to try and get a consistent working gcc. This crashed. I repeated
40 > > the invocation, and it crashed more quickly. :-(
41 > >
42 > > At this point, I thought, just reload "everything" from the stage3, with
43 > >
44 > > # cd / ; bunzip2 /stage3-amd64-20100121.tar.gz
45 > >
46 > > , which didn't help either. I emerged gentoolkit, to see if I could get
47 > > some handle on the mess. Then
48 > >
49 > > # revdep-rebuild -p
50 > >
51 > > threw a segfault.
52 > >
53 > > At this point, I'm feeling a bit sad. My rough guess is that there's
54 > > some conflict somewhere between 32-bit and 64-bit code, and some of my
55 > > USE flags are inconsistent with some others, or the kernel, or something
56 > > like that.
57 > >
58 > > One other thing I remember vaguely is that early on, some emerge told me
59 > > I had to "revdep-rebuild" something. I wasn't able to do this through
60 > > not yet knowing what "revdep-rebuild" meant, and not having any file of
61 > > that name on my system. Could this be the cause?
62 > >
63 > > Finally, is there a way of reloading/rebuilding ALL the executables
64 > > onto/on my system without discarding all my painfully wrought config
65 > > files and without portage getting confused?
66 > >
67 > > Thanks in advance for the help!
68 >
69 --
70 William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au>
71 Home in Perth!