| 1 |
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 24/08/14 20:05, Tom H wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNEL=="enp3s0u1", NAME="net0" |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> "enp3s0u1" isn't a kernel name; it's an "ID_NET_NAME_PATH" attribute. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> That's what came to my mind too, that's why I instructed him away from it. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Yeah, I saw your email after I sent mine. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I now have to figure out why you're recommending a 80< prefix when I |
| 14 |
thought that a >80 prefix is necessary in order AFAIK to override |
| 15 |
"/lib/udev/rules.d/80-net-setup-link.rules". |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I tried 75- instead of 85- this morning before leaving for work and |
| 18 |
the interfaces were renamed properly so I'm clearly wrong... |
Archives