| 1 |
Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 10:09:17 schrieb Marc Joliet: |
| 2 |
> Am Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:12:26 -0700 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> schrieb kashani <kashani-list@××××××××.net>: |
| 5 |
> > I've noticed this a couple of times this week. A few of you have |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > responded to the annoying Fortran thread, changed the subject, started a |
| 8 |
> > new message, and sent the email starting a new thread. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I have not noticed this. Scanning through the thread, I do not see any |
| 11 |
> subject changes. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> > Because you responded to an existing thread you are not creating a new |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > thread and thus and reducing the size of the audience that reads your |
| 16 |
> > email. Specially I'd have responded to "open source monitoring on |
| 17 |
> > gentoo", but since I deleted the Fortran thread in its boring entirety I |
| 18 |
> > didn't even see it until I saw a response further down the chain today. |
| 19 |
> > Whoever started Fbsplash did the same thing. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> For me, both of the threads you mention appear as their own threads (using |
| 22 |
> claws-mail). So I checked the email sources and could not find any |
| 23 |
> "References" headers in either of the thread parents. So, perhaps this is |
| 24 |
> a bug in Thunderbird? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> > kashani |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> HTH |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
same here, no thread problems with kde-base/kmail-4.4.11.1 |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Maybe you should really check your client. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Greets |
Archives