Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Video card memory disabled?
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:04:59
Message-Id: loom.20061122T205258-855@post.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Video card memory disabled? by James
1 James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> writes:
2
3 >
4 > ==========================
5 > > $ glxgears
6 > > libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x4b
7 > > 2446 frames in 5.0 seconds = 489.111 FPS
8 > > 2441 frames in 5.0 seconds = 488.094 FPS
9 > > 2448 frames in 5.0 seconds = 489.509 FPS
10 > > 2438 frames in 5.0 seconds = 487.576 FPS
11 > > 2445 frames in 5.0 seconds = 488.976 FPS
12 > > 2442 frames in 5.0 seconds = 488.238 FPS
13 > > 2439 frames in 5.0 seconds = 487.720 FPS
14 > > ==================================================
15 >
16 > under 2.6.17-gentoo-r8 I get (glxgears):
17 > 6751 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1350.118 FPS
18 > 7174 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1434.668 FPS
19 > 6596 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1319.182 FPS
20 > 6946 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1389.107 FPS
21 > 6582 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1316.222 FPS
22 > 5700 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1139.907 FPS
23 > 7038 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1407.494 FPS
24 > 6879 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1375.700 FPS
25 > 6737 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1347.254 FPS
26 > 7072 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1414.338 FPS
27 > 7027 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1405.366 FPS
28 >
29 > > ==================================================
30
31 under 2.6.18-gentoo-r2:
32
33 7790 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1557.990 FPS
34 57673 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11534.464 FPS
35 57865 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11572.907 FPS
36 56563 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11312.441 FPS
37 54164 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10832.644 FPS
38 53139 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10627.705 FPS
39 56300 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11259.851 FPS
40 54578 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10915.574 FPS
41 55864 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11172.672 FPS
42
43
44 looks improved?
45
46
47 > > $ glxinfo
48 > > name of display: :0.0
49 > > libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x4b
50 > > display: :0 screen: 0
51 > > direct rendering: Yes
52 > > ==================================================
53 >
54 > under glxinfo (2.6.17-gentoo-r8):
55 >
56 > name of display: :0.0
57 > display: :0 screen: 0
58 > direct rendering: Yes
59 > server glx vendor string: SGI
60 > server glx version string: 1.2
61 > <snip very long listing of info>
62
63
64 name of display: :0.0
65 display: :0 screen: 0
66 direct rendering: Yes
67 server glx vendor string: SGI
68 server glx version string: 1.2
69
70
71 > > While you're looking at this I would appreciate if you could
72 > > tell me why I am
73 > > getting this libGL warning (and how to fix it)?
74 >
75 > > Finally, I am also getting this mtrr overlap at boot:
76 > > ==================================================
77 > > mtrr: 0x48000000,0x8000000 overlaps existing 0x48000000,0x1000000
78 > > mtrr: 0x48000000,0x8000000 overlaps existing 0x48000000,0x1000000
79 > > mtrr: 0x48000000,0x8000000 overlaps existing 0x48000000,0x1000000
80 > > mtrr: 0x48000000,0x8000000 overlaps existing 0x48000000,0x1000000
81 > > mtrr: 0x48000000,0x8000000 overlaps existing 0x48000000,0x1000000
82 > > agpgart: Found an AGP 2.0 compliant device at 0000:00:00.0.
83 > > agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:00:00.0 into 4x mode
84 > > agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:01:00.0 into 4x mode
85 > > [drm] Setting GART location based on new memory map
86 > > [drm] writeback test succeeded in 1 usecs
87 > > ====
88 >
89 > under glxinfo (2.6.17-gentoo-r8) && greping dmesg for9 gl drm agp) I get:
90 > [drm] Initialized drm 1.0.1 20051102
91 > [drm] Initialized radeon 1.24.0 20060225 on minor 0
92 > [drm] Setting GART location based on new memory map
93 > [drm] Loading R200 Microcode
94 > [drm] writeback test succeeded in 1 usecs
95 >
96 > agpgart: Detected SiS 646 chipset
97 > agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M <at> 0xe8000000
98 > agpgart: Found an AGP 2.0 compliant device at 0000:00:00.0.
99 > agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:00:00.0 into 1x mode
100 > agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:01:00.0 into 1x mode
101 >
102 > Does look suspicious....
103
104
105 dmesg | grep drm
106 [drm] Initialized drm 1.0.1 20051102
107 [drm] Initialized radeon 1.25.0 20060524 on minor 0
108 [drm] Setting GART location based on new memory map
109 [drm] Loading R200 Microcode
110 [drm] writeback test succeeded in 1 usecs
111
112
113 dmesg | grep agp
114 Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones
115 agpgart: Detected SiS 646 chipset
116 agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xe8000000
117 agpgart: Found an AGP 2.0 compliant device at 0000:00:00.0.
118 agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:00:00.0 into 1x mode
119 agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:01:00.0 into 1x mode
120
121
122 I'm not sure what all of this means, but, bzflag
123 crashed once before using this 2.6.18-gentoo-r2
124 kernel......
125
126 hth,
127
128
129 James
130
131
132
133
134
135 --
136 gentoo-user@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Video card memory disabled? Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>