| 1 |
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:25:03 +0200 |
| 2 |
Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu@×××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Thursday 25 October 2007, Albert Hopkins wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > Oh do they do that now? That was that nasty Red Hat extension. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> While one might agree or disagree about that, IMHO the problem now is |
| 9 |
> that the options in /etc/default/useradd are ignored. If I run |
| 10 |
> useradd -D it shows GROUP=100, but running useradd <username> still |
| 11 |
> creates a new group named after the user and puts the user into it. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Exactly my point! :) |
| 15 |
You were ahead of me with this reply, but it came here after I sent my |
| 16 |
previous message. Sorry for the noise and redundancy. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> After a little search, it seems that the USERGROUPS_ENAB directive |
| 20 |
> in /etc/login.defs, although not explicitly mentioning this issue, is |
| 21 |
> the culprit. Setting it to "no" restores the old behavior (putting |
| 22 |
> the new users into group "users"). |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Big thanks! |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
That's exactly what I needed. ;-)))) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
Best regards, |
| 35 |
Daniel |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives