| 1 |
traceroute --help is still there though. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Érico V. Porto |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Florian Philipp <lists@×××××××××××.net>wrote: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Am 06.11.2011 20:07, schrieb Mick: |
| 9 |
> > On Sunday 06 Nov 2011 16:52:02 Alex Schuster wrote: |
| 10 |
> >> Florian Philipp writes: |
| 11 |
> >>> Am 06.11.2011 14:13, schrieb Mick: |
| 12 |
> >>>> Why would there be no traceroute(8) man page on my laptop? |
| 13 |
> >>>> |
| 14 |
> >>>> An older x86 box has it and displays it without fuss. |
| 15 |
> >>> |
| 16 |
> >>> It seems that the man page has been dropped from the package. Only the |
| 17 |
> >>> old 2.0.3 version from sourceforge still contains it. I couldn't find |
| 18 |
> >>> any mention on on bugs.g.o or traceroute-devel. |
| 19 |
> >> |
| 20 |
> >> I have traceroute-2.0.18 installed, and I do have the man page. |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > I am getting confused. x86 box has traceroute-2.0.15 with man page, |
| 23 |
> while |
| 24 |
> > amd_64 box has same version and no man page. |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> I bet the man-page disappears when you re-emerge traceroute. According |
| 28 |
> to changelog, the patch I mentioned in a different message was |
| 29 |
> introduced without changing the revision number (it doesn't have to |
| 30 |
> because it just fixes a build problem). If you emerged traceroute-2.0.15 |
| 31 |
> before the patch was applied, you got the man-page. Afterwards, it is lost. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Regards, |
| 34 |
> Florian Philipp |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
Archives