| 1 |
On 09/13/2010 09:37 PM, Stéphane Guedon wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 13 September 2010 20:28:07 J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Monday 13 September 2010 20:15:24 Stéphane Guedon wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Monday 13 September 2010 21:06:48 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> On 09/13/2010 09:15 AM, Stéphane Guedon wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>>> Since few days ( two or three ?), every time I launch emerge, |
| 7 |
>>>>> it's |
| 8 |
>>>>> saying me it needs an update of portage itself. |
| 9 |
>>>>> In plus, I have upgraded udev at least two times (160>161>162 |
| 10 |
>>>>> today)... |
| 11 |
>>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>>> Plus, I have had two warning message concerning updates : sudo |
| 13 |
>>>>> and an |
| 14 |
>>>>> other... |
| 15 |
>>>>> |
| 16 |
>>>>> what's going on ? Is somebody founding security holes "à la |
| 17 |
>>>>> pelle" |
| 18 |
>>>>> (french expression). |
| 19 |
>>>> |
| 20 |
>>>> emerge -al1 portage |
| 21 |
>>>> |
| 22 |
>>>> (Note the "l" option.) |
| 23 |
>>> |
| 24 |
>>> today, one more ! portage to the 2.1.9.4 if I remember exactly ! |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
>> Do you have "ACCEPT_KEYWORDS" set to something starting with a "~..."? |
| 27 |
>> |
| 28 |
>> If yes, then you can expect regular updates to further "unstable" versions. |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> -- |
| 31 |
>> Joost |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> yes, of course... but... one release per day ? strange isn't it ? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
No, not really. Developers push fixes for problems reported in |
| 36 |
bugs.gentoo.org and ask the users to test whether the fixes work as |
| 37 |
expected. It's normal that this can result in very fast version updates. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
And as said previously, the "-l" option of emerge will tell you why an |
| 40 |
update was pushed into portage. |
Archives