Archives
Archives
| From: | Dan Farrell <dan@×××××××××.cx> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] A DNS question. | ||
| Date: | Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:30:58 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070304112523.602e272f@pascal.spore.ath.cx | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] A DNS question. by Reuben Farrelly |
||
| 1 | On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 10:57:01 +1100 |
| 2 | Reuben Farrelly <reuben-gentoo-user@××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > That way there is no need to ever have hosts resolve to private RFC |
| 5 | > 1918 IP addresses from the Internet. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | in fact, and as already hinted at, there's no way for traffic from the |
| 8 | outside world to be routed to a host with a private ip address, so |
| 9 | names publicly resolving to private addresses certainly aren't going to |
| 10 | work. You should use NAT instead. |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |