Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: gevisz <gevisz@×××××.com>
To: "gentoo-user@l.g.o" <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Will emerge-webrsyc work in the future?
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 08:20:25
Message-Id: CA+t6X7ewKH5XsX-KmyzUyj4T-Txfbfef=ZfwE_9kDt40+nBeoQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Will emerge-webrsyc work in the future? by Alon Bar-Lev
1 2015-08-12 11:10 GMT+03:00 Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl@g.o>:
2 > I am waiting as well... :)
3 >
4 > In the meantime, please do not use this script directly any more.
5
6 Why?
7
8 What is the shotcomings of using that script directly?
9
10 > Create:
11 > /etc/portage/repos.conf/gentoo.conf
12
13 I do have such a file, but there stands:
14
15 [DEFAULT]
16 main-repo = gentoo
17
18 [gentoo]
19 location = /usr/portage
20 auto-sync = no
21 sync-type = rsync
22 sync-uri = rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage
23
24 Not exactly what I want. :)
25
26 > ---
27 > [DEFAULT]
28 > main-repo = gentoo
29 >
30 > [gentoo]
31 > location = /usr/portage
32 > sync-type = webrsync
33 > ---
34 >
35 > Then use:
36 >
37 > # emerge --sync
38 >
39 >
40 > On 12 August 2015 at 11:01, gevisz <gevisz@×××××.com> wrote:
41 >> Already for the third day, emerge-webrsyc says me that
42 >> my "current local timestamp is possibly identical to the
43 >> * timestamp of the latest snapshot," so I began to worry
44 >> if this way of syncing my portage tree still works and will
45 >> work in the future.
46 >>
47 >> # emerge-webrsync
48 >> Fetching most recent snapshot ...
49 >> Trying to retrieve 20150811 snapshot from http://mirror.netcologne.de/gentoo ...
50 >> Fetching file portage-20150811.tar.xz.md5sum ...
51 >> Fetching file portage-20150811.tar.bz2.md5sum ...
52 >> Fetching file portage-20150811.tar.gz.md5sum ...
53 >> Trying to retrieve 20150811 snapshot from http://de-mirror.org/gentoo ...
54 >> Fetching file portage-20150811.tar.xz.md5sum ...
55 >> Fetching file portage-20150811.tar.bz2.md5sum ...
56 >> Fetching file portage-20150811.tar.gz.md5sum ...
57 >> 20150811 snapshot was not found
58 >> Trying to retrieve 20150810 snapshot from http://mirror.netcologne.de/gentoo ...
59 >> Fetching file portage-20150810.tar.xz.md5sum ...
60 >> Fetching file portage-20150810.tar.bz2.md5sum ...
61 >> Fetching file portage-20150810.tar.gz.md5sum ...
62 >> Trying to retrieve 20150810 snapshot from http://de-mirror.org/gentoo ...
63 >> Fetching file portage-20150810.tar.xz.md5sum ...
64 >> Fetching file portage-20150810.tar.bz2.md5sum ...
65 >> Fetching file portage-20150810.tar.gz.md5sum ...
66 >> 20150810 snapshot was not found
67 >> Trying to retrieve 20150809 snapshot from http://mirror.netcologne.de/gentoo ...
68 >> Fetching file portage-20150809.tar.xz.md5sum ...
69 >> Fetching file portage-20150809.tar.bz2.md5sum ...
70 >> Fetching file portage-20150809.tar.gz.md5sum ...
71 >> Trying to retrieve 20150809 snapshot from http://de-mirror.org/gentoo ...
72 >> Fetching file portage-20150809.tar.xz.md5sum ...
73 >> Fetching file portage-20150809.tar.bz2.md5sum ...
74 >> Fetching file portage-20150809.tar.gz.md5sum ...
75 >> 20150809 snapshot was not found
76 >> * Latest snapshot date: 20150808
77 >> *
78 >> * Approximate snapshot timestamp: 1439081100
79 >> * Current local timestamp: 1439080501
80 >> *
81 >> * The current local timestamp is possibly identical to the
82 >> * timestamp of the latest snapshot. In order to force sync, use
83 >> * the --revert option or remove the timestamp file located at
84 >> * '/usr/portage/metadata/timestamp.x'.
85 >>
86 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Will emerge-webrsyc work in the future? Alon Bar-Lev <alonbl@g.o>