Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <michael@××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone got any older Portage snapshots kicking around? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 16 Jul 2011 18:12:36 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4E21D44A.8010806@orlitzky.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-user] Anyone got any older Portage snapshots kicking around? by Stroller |
||
| 1 | On 07/16/2011 12:53 PM, Stroller wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > I have no illusions that attempting this *will* be a pain the ass, |
| 4 | > because in the past I've updated machines which have been ignored for |
| 5 | > 18 months, and that required lots of manually digging in the Portage |
| 6 | > CVS attic and copying files into the local overlay by hand. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Couldn't you just extract a stage3/snapshot in the root, and then emerge |
| 10 | -e world? I haven't tried it naturally, but it sounds like a good idea |
| 11 | to me at this moment. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone got any older Portage snapshots kicking around? | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> |