Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -j, make -j and make -l
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 23:22:27
Message-Id: 20111127232108.08cbacfd@digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -j, make -j and make -l by Pandu Poluan
1 On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:56:17 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
2
3 > I don't know where the 'blame' lies, but I've found myself
4 > standardizing on MAKEOPTS=-j3, and PORTAGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--jobs
5 > --load-average=<1.6*num_of_vCPU>"
6 >
7 > (Yes, no explicit number of jobs. The newer portages are smart enough to
8 > keep starting new jobs until the load number is reached)
9
10 The problem I found with that is the ebuilds load the system lightly to
11 start with, before they enter the compile phase, to portage starts dozens
12 of parallel ebuilds, then the system gets completely bogged down when
13 they start compiling.
14
15
16 --
17 Neil Bothwick
18
19 If Microsoft made cars:
20 "The airbag system would ask "are you sure?" before deploying."

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -j, make -j and make -l Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info>
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -j, make -j and make -l Michael Mol <mikemol@×××××.com>