| 1 |
On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 01:10:30 -0700 |
| 2 |
Guillermo Antonio Amaral Bastidas <me@×××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > On the other hand, a "vanilla" Gentoo installation could be |
| 5 |
> > considered a bare Stage 3, which has so little software installed |
| 6 |
> > it has to be the most secure. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Also worth pointing out is since such a 'vanilla' stage3 would have |
| 9 |
quite recent software, making it more likely that recently discovered |
| 10 |
security holes have already been patched. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
For this reason I think gentoo is a good cantidate for 'most secure |
| 13 |
distro', the point already having been made that such a distinction is |
| 14 |
basically meaningless. |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives