Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@×××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRC update to 0.11.5 - safe if using older udev (pinned to udev-181)?
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:19:42
Message-Id: 50ABD73D.7040308@libertytrek.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRC update to 0.11.5 - safe if using older udev (pinned to udev-181)? by Bruce Hill
1 On 2012-11-20 12:05 PM, Bruce Hill <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com> wrote:
2 > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:46:59AM -0500, Tanstaafl wrote:
3 >> Anyone?
4 >>
5 >> I don't see any news blurbs warning about it, but with everything going
6 >> on with udev, systemd, etc, I'm not risking updating unless/until I know
7 >> it is safe.
8
9 > Have you read the requirements in
10 > /usr/portage/sys-apps/openrc/openrc-0.11.5.ebuild ?
11
12 I don't see anything in there labeled 'requirements'...
13
14 All I found was:
15
16 RDEPEND="virtual/init
17 kernel_FreeBSD? ( || ( >=sys-freebsd/freebsd-ubin-9.0_rc
18 sys-process/fuser-bsd ) )
19 elibc_glibc? ( >=sys-libs/glibc-2.5 )
20 ncurses? ( sys-libs/ncurses )
21 pam? ( sys-auth/pambase )
22 >=sys-apps/baselayout-2.1-r1
23 kernel_linux? (
24 sys-process/psmisc
25 )
26 !<sys-fs/udev-133"
27
28 So, *maybe* the last line means it needs a udev not less than 133 - but
29 I don't know enough about how ebuilds to work to risk an unbootable
30 system if it doesn't mean what I think it means.
31
32 Sorry, I'm not a programmer and don't know what to look for (or even
33 where to look until you pointed me to the file), so how about just a
34 simple answer?

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRC update to 0.11.5 - safe if using older udev (pinned to udev-181)? Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRC update to 0.11.5 - safe if using older udev (pinned to udev-181)? Bruce Hill <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRC update to 0.11.5 - safe if using older udev (pinned to udev-181)? Bruce Hill <daddy@×××××××××××××××××××××.com>