| 1 |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:17:00 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> > So every ebuild, in the tree and all overlays, was updated before the |
| 4 |
> > split ebuilds were introduced? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> I don't know the exact progress but I think the split ebuilds were |
| 7 |
> introduced masked, then the dependencies have been adjusted |
| 8 |
> accordingly. After the transition was done the ebuilds have been |
| 9 |
> unmasked. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
OK, so the meta ebuild is just a safety net for those running ebuilds not |
| 12 |
in the portage tree. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
All things in moderation, ESPECIALLY moderation. |
Archives