| 1 |
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:47:35AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 2 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 11:31 on Wednesday 01 June 2011, Indi did |
| 3 |
> opine thusly: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:00:01AM +0200, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > Personally, I'd be livid if portage were to remove my carefully crafted |
| 7 |
> > > work from time immemorial, without so much as a by-your-leave. Anyone |
| 8 |
> > > who wants to delete his own work is free to do so, but the rest of us |
| 9 |
> > > ought not to be required to suffer it. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Doesn't matter to me, my longstanding rsync habit ensures there are |
| 12 |
> > always a couple of copies of my last known good configuration. |
| 13 |
> > Doesn't your carefully crafted work from time immemorial deserve |
| 14 |
> > rsync too? [cue rsync jingle] |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > :) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> That's like saying that just because I have panel-beating skills and lots of |
| 19 |
> scrap metal in the back yard that it's perfectly OK for marauding gangs of |
| 20 |
> thugs to have at my car in the parking lots with baseball bats. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Comapring a simple rsync command with hard physical labor? |
| 24 |
Nah... |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
caveat utilitor |
| 28 |
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ |
Archives