1 |
On Wednesday 17 October 2007, Tapio Raevaara wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> "Network monitoring" can be interpreted in many different ways, are you |
4 |
> sure your users realize what that really means? |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Unless you've already done so, it might be a good idea to send a message |
7 |
> reminding of the policy to all users, mention that a single user has been |
8 |
> violating that policy, and that if this will not stop immediately, you'll |
9 |
> be forced to start monitoring the traffic. |
10 |
|
11 |
I'd go further than that, I would be more specific regarding the way in which |
12 |
that user violated the policy: e.g. used company IT equipment to |
13 |
access 'such & such' type of website in company time. In my company, 'social |
14 |
networking websites' like myface, youtube and what not, are out of bounds. |
15 |
Ditto for ebay - employees were spending far too much time browsing deals on |
16 |
ebay. |
17 |
|
18 |
Also, what are the implications of violating the policy - speak to your HR |
19 |
department first and reiterate these in the same message; e.g. porn may be |
20 |
instant dismissal, but ebay may just result in a disciplinary hearing. Then |
21 |
check that (s)he (and others) don't just use anonymouse to get to their |
22 |
preferred websites . . . |
23 |
-- |
24 |
Regards, |
25 |
Mick |