1 |
Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Howdy, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I've pretty much reached a limit on my backups. I'm up to a 16TB hard |
5 |
> drive for one and even that won't last long. Larger drives are much |
6 |
> more costly. A must have NAS is quickly approaching. I've been |
7 |
> searching around and find some things confusing. I'm hoping someone can |
8 |
> clear up that confusion. I'm also debating what path to travel down. |
9 |
> I'd also like to keep costs down as well. That said, I don't mind |
10 |
> paying a little more for one that would offer a much better option. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Path one, buy a NAS, possibly used, that has no drives. If possible, I |
13 |
> may even replace the OS that comes on it or upgrade if I can. I'm not |
14 |
> looking for fancy, or even RAID. Just looking for a two bay NAS that |
15 |
> will work. First, what is a DAS? Is that totally different than a |
16 |
> NAS? From what I've found, a DAS is not what I'm looking for since I |
17 |
> want a ethernet connection and the ability to control things over the |
18 |
> network. It seems DAS lacks that feature but not real sure. I'm not |
19 |
> sure I can upgrade the software/OS on a DAS either. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Next thing. Let's say a NAS comes with two 4TB drives for a total of |
22 |
> 8TB of capacity from the factory, using LVM or similar software I |
23 |
> assume. Is that limited to that capacity or can I for example replace |
24 |
> one or both drives with for example 14TB drives for a total of 28TBs of |
25 |
> capacity? If one does that, let's say it uses LVM, can I somehow move |
26 |
> data as well or is that beyond the abilities of a NAS? Could it be done |
27 |
> inside my computer for example? Does this vary by brand or even model? |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Path two, I've researched building a NAS using a Raspberry Pi 4 8GB as |
30 |
> another option. They come as parts, cases too, but the newer and faster |
31 |
> models of Raspberry Pi 4 with more ram seem to work pretty well. The |
32 |
> old slower models with small amounts of ram don't fair as well. While I |
33 |
> want a descent speed, I'm not looking for or expecting it to be |
34 |
> blazingly fast. I just wonder, if from a upgrade and expansion point of |
35 |
> view, if building a NAS would be better. I've also noticed, it seems |
36 |
> all Raspberry things come with a display port. That means I could hook |
37 |
> up a monitor and mouse/keyboard when needed. That could be a bonus. |
38 |
> Heck, I may can even put some sort of Gentoo on that thing. :-D |
39 |
> |
40 |
> One reason I'm wanting to go this route, I'm trying to keep it small and |
41 |
> able to fit inside my fire safe. I plan to buy a media type safe that |
42 |
> is larger but right now, it needs to fit inside my current safe. Most |
43 |
> of the 2 bay NAS or a Raspberry Pi based NAS are fairly small. They not |
44 |
> much bigger than the three external hard drives and a couple bare drives |
45 |
> that currently occupy my safe. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> One thing I'd like to have no matter what path I go down, the ability to |
48 |
> encrypt the data. My current backup drives are encrypted and I'd like |
49 |
> to keep it that way. If that is possible to do. I suspect the |
50 |
> Raspberry option would since I'd control the OS/software placed on it. |
51 |
> I could be wrong tho. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> One last thing. Are there any NAS type boxes that I should absolutely |
54 |
> avoid if I go that route? Maybe it is a model that has serious |
55 |
> limitations or has other problems. I think the DAS thing may be one for |
56 |
> me to avoid but I'm not for sure what limits it has. Google didn't help |
57 |
> a lot. It also could be as simple as, avoid any model that says this in |
58 |
> the description or uses some type of software that is bad or limits |
59 |
> options. |
60 |
> |
61 |
> Thoughts? Info to share? Ideas on a best path forward? Buy already |
62 |
> built or build? |
63 |
> |
64 |
> Thanks. |
65 |
> |
66 |
> Dale |
67 |
> |
68 |
> :-) :-) |
69 |
> |
70 |
|
71 |
It does appear that several people are making it so NAS boxes can be |
72 |
easily built by us nerdy types and not be huge. Things are a bit |
73 |
interesting right now for hardware and such. Some parts are expensive, |
74 |
hard to find or just plain unavailable. Still, I suspect that this will |
75 |
get better later on. The good thing, people are working on this. There |
76 |
is interest in having a option. |
77 |
|
78 |
I may in the meantime have to split up my large directory and the |
79 |
resulting backup. Split it in half or something. I just bought a 16TB |
80 |
hard drive. It's over 90% full already. That said, my downloading is |
81 |
slowing down quite a lot. It will last a while. I may setup a old |
82 |
system as a NAS and just keep it in a outbuilding for the time being. |
83 |
Should offer me some protection at least. |
84 |
|
85 |
If anyone runs up on some info that might relate to this, please share. |
86 |
Maybe something new will come out that we don't know about now. If I do |
87 |
build something, I'll likely post and share what I used, how much effort |
88 |
was involved and the end results. Maybe this will help others as well. |
89 |
|
90 |
Thanks. |
91 |
|
92 |
Dale |
93 |
|
94 |
:-) :-) |
95 |
|
96 |
P. S. I currently have a spare 14TB, 8TB and 6TB hard drive not in |
97 |
use. That's 28TBs available. That's a good start on a NAS as far as |
98 |
drives go. Currently in use in external enclosures for backups, 16Tb, |
99 |
8TB and a 6TB hard drive. |