Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "»Q«" <boxcars@×××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd?
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 04:21:13
Message-Id: 20090117220844.1ecf80dd@prezmyra.remarqs.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: uvesafb - does it require use of initramfs/initrd? by Paul Hartman
1 In <58965d8a0901171927q12cac290ocead4eb8409d9cc8@××××××××××.com>,
2 Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Paul Hartman
5 > <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> wrote:
6 > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 6:32 PM, »Q« <boxcars@×××.net> wrote:
7 > >> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:42:30 -0600
8
9 > >> You mean you are now successfully using uvesafb *without* an
10 > >> initrd or initramfs? Spock's site says you need v86d, and I don't
11 > >> know how else to get it. If I boot a kernel without it, uvesafb
12 > >> doesn't work for me.
13 > >
14 > > Well you need the initramfs stuff is configured in the kernel as
15 > > stated in the instructions at his website, but I'm not (not have I
16 > > ever) used the initrd.
17
18 [snip]
19
20 > I forgot to specify: the kernel setting
21 >
22 > CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE="/usr/share/v86d/initramfs"
23 >
24 > compiled v86d into the kernel, so it doesn't need to execute
25 > the /sbin/v86d
26
27 Ah, thanks, I see. I think my initial confusion was due to my
28 misreading of your original post. I do it the same way you do,
29 compiling it into the kernel, both on Gentoo and Slackware.
30
31 --
32 »Q«
33 Kleeneness is next to Gödelness.